Live Chat
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States

Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States

Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. the United States

Read More
Hamer vs. Sidway

Hamer vs. Sidway

Louisa W. Hamer, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Franklin Sidway, an executor of William E. Story, Defendant-Appellant 22 Ill.36 N.Y. St. Rptr. 888, 124 N.Y. 538, 27 N.E. 256, 1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1396 February 24, 1891, Argued April 14, 1891, Decided Court of Appeals of New York Introduction Hamer v. Sidway was a noted case decided by the New York […]

Read More
California Democratic Party and others versus Bill Jones

California Democratic Party versus Bill Jones

Case name: California Democratic Party and others versus Bill Jones (California secretary of state) and others. Court: The Supreme Court of the United States. Citation: 22 Ill.530 U.S. 567, 120 S. Ct. 2402, 147 L. Ed. 2d 502 (2000). Key Facts The petitioners in the case were four political parties by the names: California Democratic […]

Read More
United States v. Yousef Ramzi

United States v. Yousef Ramzi

Parties: United States (Plaintiff) v Yousef Ramzi (Defendant) Facts: Between the years 1993-1994, Yousef entered Philippines’s capital under a disguised identity and stayed in Manila. During his stay here, he developed a plan that would bomb the said airliners (McCurry, 1993). He recruited some individuals to help him achieve his mission. They obtained bomb-making materials […]

Read More
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Anti-Trust Law

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Anti-Trust Law

Foreign corrupt practices acts are measures put in place by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the main purpose of ensuring that U.S companies do not engage themselves in unethical practices such as bribing individuals from foreign countries with an aim of receiving government contracts or other forms of business. This paper […]

Read More
Washington v. Texas

Washington v. Texas

Procedural facts. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed petitioner’s sentence for murder with malice. He tried to review by certiorari this judgment, but the trial court refused to allow it. The Supreme Court reversed this judgment and affirmed petitioner’s conviction for his sentence and murder. (This would consist of two or three sentences outlining […]

Read More